Everything about Phronesis totally explained
Phronesis (
Greek: φρόνησις) in
Aristotle's
Nicomachean Ethics is the virtue of moral thought, usually translated "practical wisdom", sometimes as "
prudence".
Aristotle distinguishes between two intellectual
virtues:
sophia and
phronesis.
Sophia (usually translated "
wisdom") is the ability to think well about the nature of the world, to discern why the world is the way it's (this is sometimes equated with
science);
sophia involves deliberation concerning universal truths.
Phronesis is the capability to consider the mode of action in order to deliver change, especially to enhance the quality of life. Aristotle says that
phronesis isn't simply a skill, however, as it involves not only the ability to decide how to achieve a certain end, but also the ability to reflect upon and determine that end (this latter point is denied by some commentators, who contend that Aristotle considers the desired end,
eudaimonia, to be given, such that
phronesis is merely the ability to achieve that end).
Gaining
phronesis requires maturation, in Aristotle's thought:
Phronesis is concerned with particulars, because it's concerned with how to act in particular situations. One can learn the principles of action, but applying them in the real world, in situations one couldn't have foreseen, requires experience of the world. For example, if one knows that one should be honest, one might act in certain situations in ways that cause pain and offense; knowing how to apply honesty in balance with other considerations and in specific contexts requires experience.
Aristotle holds that having
phronesis is both necessary and sufficient for being virtuous; because
phronesis is practical, it's impossible to be both
phronimos and
akratic.
Aristotle's importance to
mediæval European thought led
phronesis to be included as one of the four
cardinal virtues.
Bent Flyvbjerg, in his book
Making Social Science Matter, has argued that instead of trying to emulate the natural sciences, the social sciences should be practiced as
phronesis.
Phronetic social science (External Link
) focuses on four value-rational questions: (1) Where are we going? (2) Who gains and who loses, by which mechanisms of power? (3) Is this development desirable? (4) What should we do about it?
In
After Virtue Alasdair MacIntyre makes a similar call for a phronetic social science, combined with weighty criticism of attempts by social scientists to emulate natural science. He points out that for every prediction made by a social scientific theory there are usually
counter-examples. These derive from the
unpredictability of human beings, and the fact that one unpredictable human being can have a world-changing impact. Following
Pascal, he points out that the shape of
Cleopatra's nose changed the course of history, for if her profile hadn't been classically beautiful it's unlikely that
Mark Anthony would have pursued her, with significant consequences for
Roman political history.
Sources and further reading
- Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, dual text, with translation by H. Rackham (Harvard University Press, 1934) ISBN 0-674-99081-1 (External Link
)
- Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics trans. Terence Irwin (2nd edition; Hackett, 1999) ISBN 0-87220-464-2
- Robert Bernasconi, “Heidegger’s Destruction of Phronesis,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 supp. (1989): 127–47.
- Flyvbjerg, Bent, Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
- Clifford Geertz, "Empowering Aristotle." Science, vol. 293, July 6, 2001, p. 53. (External Link
)
- Martin Heidegger, Plato's Sophist (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997).
- Gerard J. Hughes, Aristotle on Ethics (Routledge, 2001) ISBN 0-415-22187-0
- Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (Duckworth, 1985)ISBN 0-7156-1663-3
- William McNeill, The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999).
- Amélie Oksenberg Rorty [ed.], Esays on Aristotle's Ethics (University of California Press, 1980) ISBN 0-520-04041-4
- Richard Sorabji, "Aristotle on the Role of Intellect in Virtue" (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74, 1973–1974; pp 107–129. Reprinted in Rorty)
- David Wiggins, "Deliberation and Practical Reason" (Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76, 1975–1976; pp 29–51. Reprinted in Rorty)
Further Information
Get more info on 'Phronesis'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://phronesis.totallyexplained.com">Phronesis Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |